Comments on: Google.cn and http headers http://praveenpn.com/blog/2010/03/23/google-cn-and-http-headers/ Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:47:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: Praveenhttp://praveenpn.com/blog/2010/03/23/google-cn-and-http-headers/comment-page-1/#comment-7959 Praveen Wed, 11 Apr 2012 18:15:00 +0000 http://praveenpn.com/blog/?p=136#comment-7959 Hey Bruce,I didn't really go back and check after I wrote the post. Just something that I saw and blogged(noted down rather) instinctively. You are probably right about it being a timestamp and nothing more :) Hey Bruce,

I didn’t really go back and check after I wrote the post. Just something that I saw and blogged(noted down rather) instinctively. You are probably right about it being a timestamp and nothing more :)

]]> By: Anonymoushttp://praveenpn.com/blog/2010/03/23/google-cn-and-http-headers/comment-page-1/#comment-7957 Anonymous Thu, 05 Apr 2012 18:43:00 +0000 http://praveenpn.com/blog/?p=136#comment-7957 Hey, just stumbled on your blog... :-)  This has since changed & you may have figured this out but it looks more like UST == timestamp.  Try a Unix epoch conversion of the first 10 digits (ie 1269345306 == GMT: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:55:06 GMT).  Guessing it probably was a cachebuster... Hey, just stumbled on your blog… :-)   This has since changed & you may have figured this out but it looks more like UST == timestamp.  Try a Unix epoch conversion of the first 10 digits (ie 1269345306 == GMT: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:55:06 GMT).  Guessing it probably was a cachebuster…

]]>