<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Gmail has got themes, so?</title> <atom:link href="http://praveenpn.com/blog/2008/11/21/gmail-has-got-themes-so/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://praveenpn.com/blog/2008/11/21/gmail-has-got-themes-so/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator> <item><title>By: Praveen</title><link>http://praveenpn.com/blog/2008/11/21/gmail-has-got-themes-so/comment-page-1/#comment-181</link> <dc:creator>Praveen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 04:35:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://praveenpn.com/blog/2008/11/21/gmail-has-got-themes-so/#comment-181</guid> <description>@DPreacher you can&#039;t just ignore the fact by calling &#039;basic html&#039; mode as safe mode.Check Y! mail classic for that matter, the reason both Gmail &amp; Y! mail have a lighter(non-ajaxy) version is, to give the users with slow internet connection the same features and experience(not in every sense) like the other users who are on a high speed connection.and why would someone deliberately switch the so called &#039;safe mode&#039; ON?
The only reason I can think of is slow connection, so the question is, why make the basic features inaccessible to the people using slow speed internet?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@DPreacher you can&#8217;t just ignore the fact by calling &#8216;basic html&#8217; mode as safe mode.</p><p>Check Y! mail classic for that matter, the reason both Gmail &#038; Y! mail have a lighter(non-ajaxy) version is, to give the users with slow internet connection the same features and experience(not in every sense) like the other users who are on a high speed connection.</p><p>and why would someone deliberately switch the so called &#8216;safe mode&#8217; ON?<br
/> The only reason I can think of is slow connection, so the question is, why make the basic features inaccessible to the people using slow speed internet?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Diabolic Preacher</title><link>http://praveenpn.com/blog/2008/11/21/gmail-has-got-themes-so/comment-page-1/#comment-180</link> <dc:creator>Diabolic Preacher</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 04:09:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://praveenpn.com/blog/2008/11/21/gmail-has-got-themes-so/#comment-180</guid> <description>The basic HTML view is a little different from what you&#039;re used to because the following features aren&#039;t available:* Spell checker
* Keyboard shortcuts
* Creating filters
* Adding, editing, importing, or deleting contacts
* Custom &#039;From:&#039; addresses
* Rich formatting
source: The basic HTML view is a little different from what you&#039;re used to because the following features aren&#039;t available:* Spell checker
* Keyboard shortcuts
* Creating filters
* Adding, editing, importing, or deleting contacts
* Custom &#039;From:&#039; addresses
* Rich formatting
source: http://tr.im/1c7p (gmail faq)they really want you to treat it like safe mode and assume that all safe mode products are basically crippled.i don&#039;t think ppl take the beta sticker that much literally as far as google is concerned.what do you mean, you can&#039;t differentiate between unread n read mails? :) i haven&#039;t used all the funky blurry themes, but so far..even in terminal, there are font color n weight differentiation.and lastly, gmail themes vs stylish scripts. what looks and performs better? i think stylish loads faster. might not be location/time based. but then not cross-browser.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The basic HTML view is a little different from what you&#8217;re used to because the following features aren&#8217;t available:</p><p> * Spell checker<br
/> * Keyboard shortcuts<br
/> * Creating filters<br
/> * Adding, editing, importing, or deleting contacts<br
/> * Custom &#8216;From:&#8217; addresses<br
/> * Rich formatting<br
/> source: The basic HTML view is a little different from what you&#8217;re used to because the following features aren&#8217;t available:</p><p> * Spell checker<br
/> * Keyboard shortcuts<br
/> * Creating filters<br
/> * Adding, editing, importing, or deleting contacts<br
/> * Custom &#8216;From:&#8217; addresses<br
/> * Rich formatting<br
/> source: <a
href="http://tr.im/1c7p" rel="nofollow">http://tr.im/1c7p</a> (gmail faq)</p><p>they really want you to treat it like safe mode and assume that all safe mode products are basically crippled.</p><p>i don&#8217;t think ppl take the beta sticker that much literally as far as google is concerned.</p><p>what do you mean, you can&#8217;t differentiate between unread n read mails? <img
src='http://praveenpn.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> i haven&#8217;t used all the funky blurry themes, but so far..even in terminal, there are font color n weight differentiation.</p><p>and lastly, gmail themes vs stylish scripts. what looks and performs better? i think stylish loads faster. might not be location/time based. but then not cross-browser.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: praveenpn.com @ 2012-05-20 08:33:27 -->
