<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gmail has got themes, so?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://praveenpn.com/blog/2008/11/21/gmail-has-got-themes-so/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://praveenpn.com/blog/2008/11/21/gmail-has-got-themes-so/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:08:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Praveen</title>
		<link>http://praveenpn.com/blog/2008/11/21/gmail-has-got-themes-so/comment-page-1/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>Praveen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 04:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praveenpn.com/blog/2008/11/21/gmail-has-got-themes-so/#comment-181</guid>
		<description>@DPreacher you can&#039;t just ignore the fact by calling &#039;basic html&#039; mode as safe mode.

Check Y! mail classic for that matter, the reason both Gmail &amp; Y! mail have a lighter(non-ajaxy) version is, to give the users with slow internet connection the same features and experience(not in every sense) like the other users who are on a high speed connection.

and why would someone deliberately switch the so called &#039;safe mode&#039; ON?
The only reason I can think of is slow connection, so the question is, why make the basic features inaccessible to the people using slow speed internet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@DPreacher you can&#8217;t just ignore the fact by calling &#8216;basic html&#8217; mode as safe mode.</p>
<p>Check Y! mail classic for that matter, the reason both Gmail &#038; Y! mail have a lighter(non-ajaxy) version is, to give the users with slow internet connection the same features and experience(not in every sense) like the other users who are on a high speed connection.</p>
<p>and why would someone deliberately switch the so called &#8216;safe mode&#8217; ON?<br />
The only reason I can think of is slow connection, so the question is, why make the basic features inaccessible to the people using slow speed internet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diabolic Preacher</title>
		<link>http://praveenpn.com/blog/2008/11/21/gmail-has-got-themes-so/comment-page-1/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>Diabolic Preacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 04:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praveenpn.com/blog/2008/11/21/gmail-has-got-themes-so/#comment-180</guid>
		<description>The basic HTML view is a little different from what you&#039;re used to because the following features aren&#039;t available:

    * Spell checker
    * Keyboard shortcuts
    * Creating filters
    * Adding, editing, importing, or deleting contacts
    * Custom &#039;From:&#039; addresses
    * Rich formatting
source: The basic HTML view is a little different from what you&#039;re used to because the following features aren&#039;t available:

    * Spell checker
    * Keyboard shortcuts
    * Creating filters
    * Adding, editing, importing, or deleting contacts
    * Custom &#039;From:&#039; addresses
    * Rich formatting
source: http://tr.im/1c7p (gmail faq)

they really want you to treat it like safe mode and assume that all safe mode products are basically crippled.

i don&#039;t think ppl take the beta sticker that much literally as far as google is concerned.

what do you mean, you can&#039;t differentiate between unread n read mails? :) i haven&#039;t used all the funky blurry themes, but so far..even in terminal, there are font color n weight differentiation.

and lastly, gmail themes vs stylish scripts. what looks and performs better? i think stylish loads faster. might not be location/time based. but then not cross-browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The basic HTML view is a little different from what you&#8217;re used to because the following features aren&#8217;t available:</p>
<p>    * Spell checker<br />
    * Keyboard shortcuts<br />
    * Creating filters<br />
    * Adding, editing, importing, or deleting contacts<br />
    * Custom &#8216;From:&#8217; addresses<br />
    * Rich formatting<br />
source: The basic HTML view is a little different from what you&#8217;re used to because the following features aren&#8217;t available:</p>
<p>    * Spell checker<br />
    * Keyboard shortcuts<br />
    * Creating filters<br />
    * Adding, editing, importing, or deleting contacts<br />
    * Custom &#8216;From:&#8217; addresses<br />
    * Rich formatting<br />
source: <a href="http://tr.im/1c7p" rel="nofollow">http://tr.im/1c7p</a> (gmail faq)</p>
<p>they really want you to treat it like safe mode and assume that all safe mode products are basically crippled.</p>
<p>i don&#8217;t think ppl take the beta sticker that much literally as far as google is concerned.</p>
<p>what do you mean, you can&#8217;t differentiate between unread n read mails? <img src='http://praveenpn.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  i haven&#8217;t used all the funky blurry themes, but so far..even in terminal, there are font color n weight differentiation.</p>
<p>and lastly, gmail themes vs stylish scripts. what looks and performs better? i think stylish loads faster. might not be location/time based. but then not cross-browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
